"300" Has an Epic-Sized Tomatometer!
It's fast approaching. The day we get to watch "300" good guys and about a zillion bad ones meet their bloody, cool-looking demises. And you know what that means: advance reviews are now coming in. So far, praise has been unanimous: "300" currently stands with a 100 percent Tomatometer.
You've got to love a review that starts with, "Possibly nowhere outside of gay porn have so many broad shoulders, bulging biceps and ripped torsos been seen onscreen." Variety's Todd McCarthy has minor reservations about how claustrophobic "300" feels, but concedes it's a necessary evil to translate comic panels to frames of film:
"Miller fans should be more pleased than anyone with what Snyder has wrought, as the director made a point of trying to reproduce all the writer's visual panels for the film, while necessarily expanding them."

Bringing out the dead in "300."
Critics occasionally pounce on a movie for historical inaccuracies and glossing over facts, but given "300"'s overt visual flourishes and pyrotechnics, nobody has any delusions this'll soon be shown in social studies classes. As Emmanuel Levy puts it:
"Existing in a hyper-real world, it unfolds as a feverish dream of an inspirational fable, full of passion, politics, and brutality. In streamlining the characters, Synder retells Miller's saga not as an ancient tale (sort of "once upon a time..."), but as a classic and eternal one."

Catching some air.
Hollywood Reporter’s Kirk Honeycutt agrees that by remaining faithful more to the graphic novel than a history book, "300" enters the realm of mythology come to life, a classic good versus evil tale envisioned again for modern times. Honeycutt writes:
"In epic battle scenes where he combines breathtaking and fluid choreography, gorgeous 3-D drawings and hundreds of visual effects, director Zack Snyder puts onscreen the seemingly impossible heroism and gore of which Homer sang in The Iliad."
Honeycutt, however, ends the review with a cautionary note:
"What isn't clear after two Frank Miller graphic novel movies is where this technique is leading. So far it has served only exaggerated blood, guts and sex. '300' suggests that it might create worlds of myth and fantasy not necessarily ruled by mayhem. If not, though, it's going to get old, even ancient, very fast."

It's always the kids who suffer.
"300" opens nationwide on March 9th, 2007. We're heading to WonderCon 2007, which is hosting a "300" screening on Friday, March 2nd, so be on the lookout for our coverage.
You've got to love a review that starts with, "Possibly nowhere outside of gay porn have so many broad shoulders, bulging biceps and ripped torsos been seen onscreen." Variety's Todd McCarthy has minor reservations about how claustrophobic "300" feels, but concedes it's a necessary evil to translate comic panels to frames of film:
"Miller fans should be more pleased than anyone with what Snyder has wrought, as the director made a point of trying to reproduce all the writer's visual panels for the film, while necessarily expanding them."

Bringing out the dead in "300."
Critics occasionally pounce on a movie for historical inaccuracies and glossing over facts, but given "300"'s overt visual flourishes and pyrotechnics, nobody has any delusions this'll soon be shown in social studies classes. As Emmanuel Levy puts it:
"Existing in a hyper-real world, it unfolds as a feverish dream of an inspirational fable, full of passion, politics, and brutality. In streamlining the characters, Synder retells Miller's saga not as an ancient tale (sort of "once upon a time..."), but as a classic and eternal one."

Catching some air.
Hollywood Reporter’s Kirk Honeycutt agrees that by remaining faithful more to the graphic novel than a history book, "300" enters the realm of mythology come to life, a classic good versus evil tale envisioned again for modern times. Honeycutt writes:
"In epic battle scenes where he combines breathtaking and fluid choreography, gorgeous 3-D drawings and hundreds of visual effects, director Zack Snyder puts onscreen the seemingly impossible heroism and gore of which Homer sang in The Iliad."
Honeycutt, however, ends the review with a cautionary note:
"What isn't clear after two Frank Miller graphic novel movies is where this technique is leading. So far it has served only exaggerated blood, guts and sex. '300' suggests that it might create worlds of myth and fantasy not necessarily ruled by mayhem. If not, though, it's going to get old, even ancient, very fast."

It's always the kids who suffer.
"300" opens nationwide on March 9th, 2007. We're heading to WonderCon 2007, which is hosting a "300" screening on Friday, March 2nd, so be on the lookout for our coverage.
Related Items
| Celeb: | Zack Snyder |
| Gerard Butler | |
| Rodrigo Santoro | |
| Lena Headey | |
| Frank Miller | |
| Movie: | 300 |
|
ZiGyStRdUsT writes: on Feb 27 2007 04:51 PM hmmm, the thing is most comics revolve around action, and the ones that don't are way to psychological making them hard to translate into film. I'ts going to be a feat to use this style and incorporate it into anything but an action/fantasy movie. (Reply to this) |
|
JackHorner1979 writes: on Feb 27 2007 05:17 PM [b]Holy mass propaganda batman![/b] 5 freakin reviews and this warrants a news report on it's 100% freshness? Come on, even Ishtar had 5 good reviews. This is a joke. Let's wait till 50 reviews come in before we start blowing each other. (Reply to this) |
|
Rip Torn writes: on Feb 27 2007 05:38 PM [b]ITS SICK[/b] Saw it last sunday at a screening with Chuck Liddle...everything I thought it would be and more! (Reply to this) |
|
TheIceGhost writes: on Feb 27 2007 05:45 PM Me too (Reply to this) |
|
Pokchu writes: on Feb 27 2007 06:16 PM It looks great, but christ, it's only five reviews. Wait longer, praising it for having a 100 percent on the tomatometer this early is just silly. (Reply to this) |
|
ryanfluet writes: on Feb 27 2007 06:44 PM [b]Whoa, don't blow your wad too early![/b] Agreed with all the above statements... even basic instinct 2 had 10 positive reviews. (Reply to this) |
|
Aokay writes: on Feb 27 2007 07:21 PM [b]so what?[/b] This movie's hype is disappointing...It is almost as if we are expected to enjoy it, like its the best movie ever before it even comes out. I don't like having choices made for me. I want it to be good, but knock off all this press BS. Even Children of Men got good reviews, lets hold off on the celebration! (Reply to this) |
|
lavatory love machine writes: on Feb 27 2007 07:39 PM there was a very negative review of 300 over at cinematical a few days ago, if that review was on the tomatometer it will leave at 85% or so, this artile means nothing "There's no doubt Frank Miller's graphic novel is a fun read, but Zack Snyder's interpretation was a boring, fast-food version of better films, with better scripts, better acting and better htt (Reply to this) |
|
Arturious writes: on Feb 27 2007 09:38 PM [b]Wow people calm down.[/b] If you have been reading anything on this site you must know that RT is overly excited about this movie. They know this is too early to be serious. Its just to give the ones who also anticipate it greatly (me) a little of hope before it finally comes out. Its certainly not supposed to be taken to mean that it will be the greatest movie ever. That review is absured when compared to other reviews. Read the user comments on that review. That critic was way too biased. So leave RT alone and I guarantee the tomatometer will be in the 80s come next Friday. (Reply to this) |
|
SlyDante writes: on Feb 27 2007 09:52 PM While I could understand them being excited over the first reviews coming in saying that it's very positive, even if it's only five reviewers & can be seen as somewhat stupid to point out, my problem kind of lies in that 300 has had a tomatometer & these reviews for nearly a week so far...So why suddenly report this now? Why not back then? This definitely sounds like a slow news day here if I didn't know any better... (Reply to this) |
|
iheartbrucecampbell writes: on Feb 27 2007 10:15 PM [b]maaaaaaan.....[/b] its gonna stink when this movie blows, huh? i must say, the preview did make me chuckle. i agree with the one guy, i want to see this technique put to use for something more than violence and tits. (Reply to this) |
|
Elixir writes: on Feb 28 2007 12:39 AM In reply to this comment (#856979) it would be kind of funny of this movie turns out to be a total stinker, i wonder what RT would say? haha, i hope it doesn't though cuz i'm really looking forward to it. (Reply to this) |
|
gerke writes: on Feb 28 2007 12:42 AM if you only can count to one, then five is epic (Reply to this) |
|
hinduchocolate writes: on Feb 28 2007 06:17 AM although i agree that it is too early to start c ounting reviews, I'm just gonna put out this other cinematical article that goes against the one already cine (Reply to this) |
|
frogleg writes: on Feb 28 2007 07:30 AM In reply to this comment (#856979) There's no more noble subject than violence and tits. (Reply to this) |
|
jarek writes: on Feb 28 2007 08:37 AM [b]Even Children of Men got good reviews?[/b] Of course it did. It was the best film of 2006. (Reply to this) |
|
skasforfags writes: on Feb 28 2007 08:51 AM Yeah I was confused about that too... All the previews and all the hype have somewhat discouraged me from trying to see this opening weekend. (Reply to this) |
|
grapeantler writes: on Feb 28 2007 09:05 AM This whole site is a joke. The Tomato meter means something about how good a film is, but it doesn't take into play how glowing the reviews were. To me, the meter is pretty much no more than a thumbs up or a thumbs down. I don't care how high it friggin gets, cause it could be made up of all 3/5 reviews for all we know. (Reply to this) |
|
unbreakable_samurai writes: on Feb 28 2007 09:16 AM It's a nice start, hopefully it keeps getting the good reviews because I can hardly wait to see this. (Reply to this) |
|
LampEft writes: on Feb 28 2007 09:38 AM Geeze, RT, the movie has only 5 reviews! Stop panting and drooling, calm down and wait for the reviews to really start pouring in. Not doing much for the site's credibility here. (Reply to this) |
| You must be registered to post comments. Login or Register. |




