Exclusive: Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince - RT's Set Visit Preview
We tour the new sets from the sixth film and chat to the stars!
Harry Potter fans: cast your minds back to January. Half-Blood Prince is atop your winter must-see list, Deathly Hallows is still one movie and if you want to read The Tales of Beedle the Bard you'll need to dig $4m out from behind the sofa. It's the middle of the month, and RT has joined Daniel Radcliffe and company on day 80 of principal photography on Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince at Leavesden Studios in London.
We're here to tour the studio and speak to the stars, and we'll have a full set visit report in time for the film's release in July 2009. Before that, though, we thought we'd share a small teaser of our time at Hogwarts.

David Yates (left) directs Daniel Radcliffe and Bonnie Wright on the Burrow set.
Familiar scenery - the Hogwarts Great Hall, Dumbledore's office, the Gryffindor common room - were present and accounted for, but we also glimpsed three very exciting new sets that will provide much of the film's visual impact. One of these; an imposing, tiled orphanage, will play host to an important flashback scene involving Dumbledore and a ten year-old boy Tom Marvolo Riddle -- a vulnerable, orphaned child, who turns out to be series villain Voldemort himself.
We also caught a glimpse of other new locations set aside for the film's finale. One half takes place in a giant cave and involves just Harry and Dumbledore. They had created an island of crystalline rock - think the Fortress of Solitude from Superman Returns - in a sea of green screen. This will, after months of effects work, be replaced by a mass of reanimated dead bodies called Inferi.

Ron (Rupert Grint, left) readies for Quidditch with his teammates and Hermione (Emma Watson, right).
"The brilliant thing about [the cave scenes] was that we did them at the at the end of a three to four month period where Michael and I had been working together almost exclusively," Radcliffe told RT when we caught up with him for a long chat. "For about the first two or three months of this film we were almost the only two actors in. The relationship between me and Michael had really built up over that time and got to the point where after three or four months we were absolutely ready to do the cave stuff."
We're here to tour the studio and speak to the stars, and we'll have a full set visit report in time for the film's release in July 2009. Before that, though, we thought we'd share a small teaser of our time at Hogwarts.

David Yates (left) directs Daniel Radcliffe and Bonnie Wright on the Burrow set.
Familiar scenery - the Hogwarts Great Hall, Dumbledore's office, the Gryffindor common room - were present and accounted for, but we also glimpsed three very exciting new sets that will provide much of the film's visual impact. One of these; an imposing, tiled orphanage, will play host to an important flashback scene involving Dumbledore and a ten year-old boy Tom Marvolo Riddle -- a vulnerable, orphaned child, who turns out to be series villain Voldemort himself.
We also caught a glimpse of other new locations set aside for the film's finale. One half takes place in a giant cave and involves just Harry and Dumbledore. They had created an island of crystalline rock - think the Fortress of Solitude from Superman Returns - in a sea of green screen. This will, after months of effects work, be replaced by a mass of reanimated dead bodies called Inferi.

Ron (Rupert Grint, left) readies for Quidditch with his teammates and Hermione (Emma Watson, right).
"The brilliant thing about [the cave scenes] was that we did them at the at the end of a three to four month period where Michael and I had been working together almost exclusively," Radcliffe told RT when we caught up with him for a long chat. "For about the first two or three months of this film we were almost the only two actors in. The relationship between me and Michael had really built up over that time and got to the point where after three or four months we were absolutely ready to do the cave stuff."
|
Oblivioncry writes: on Dec 15 2008 01:43 PM could this film be the batman begins of harry potter and the last film a dark knight of the franchise???? ;) HAHA nah kidding, but i still ahve high hopes for the movey, the only problem i had with most of the HP movies was the flow of the film. the script was just too tightly packed, sometimes 20 new things are shown in 4 min while something boring is extended to 10 minutes....kinda like episode 1, where in the first 5 minutes enough stuff for a whole movie is shown but none of it exploerd correctly. i hope this time around the movie moves along a steady wel timed pace. (Reply to this) |
|
JettaJameson writes: on Dec 15 2008 02:42 PM Can't wait for July!!! (Reply to this) |
|
Handheldmidget writes: on Dec 15 2008 05:27 PM i saw the first movies when they all came out, enjoyed em....but just recently i read the books....holy **** that was a good series....and i am ****ing thrilled for this movie....july seems far, far away right now....if you haven't read the books, and by any chance you have the mentality i had a few years back...thinking these were just silly little kids' stories....and therefore have chosen not to read them....i would strongly suggest you check em out...the first couple are sorta kiddish....but by the time goblet rolls around, and then order of the phoenix....these stories get reeeeeeaaaaally F'n dark....anyway i will shutup now....like i said...new Harry Potter fan...so gotta' ramble a little bit. (Reply to this) |
|
fargo_viper writes: on Dec 15 2008 06:08 PM abra kadabra. There's no Hogwarts without you Hagrid. (Reply to this) |
|
tfortier writes: on Dec 15 2008 11:42 PM Better than read the books, listen to the audiobook read by Stephen Fry. Its pure pleasure for a very long time! (you guys know Stephen Fry? he's a legend) I still think the first movie did a very good job bringing all that little world together. (Reply to this) |
|
blattman writes: on Dec 15 2008 11:55 PM In reply to this comment (#2185789) As much as I like movies (and they are a passion), books are a completly different medium and can not be compared. That said, I started reading this series just to see what all the hoopla was about. I was hooked and waiting in line for the last one the night it came out. The movies are fun, but can never cover the scope of this series. (Reply to this) |
|
celia h. writes: on Dec 16 2008 10:13 AM I can't wait to see this movie. All of the HP films are brilliant and they haven't made over 5 billion dollars for nothing. Everyone LOVES these movies: adults, teens, and younger children. The movies definitley keep gettting darker which is excellent because millions of fans have grown up with them and are now in their late teens early 20s (including me), so it would be very disappointing if they the films didn't mature too. I think the filmmakers do an amazing job with these films and you can really tell they care alot about the fans and that they really respect JK Rowling's creation...Each film just gets better and better and David Yates is a BRILLIANT director! I can't wait until July 17, 2009!!!! So that I can see the movie like 10 times!!!! (Reply to this) |
|
kodie131 writes: on Dec 17 2008 03:15 AM I think it would be amazing if Deathly Hallows was R. Even though it would be horrible for Warner Brothers, even though they already have enough money from the series, and I think it would give the fans who grew up the series what they want. The last novel was so gritty and full of honesty that I think it could only be covered in a film that didn't hold back. It won't happen though. (Reply to this) |
| You must be registered to post comments. Login or Register. |






