This week at the movies, we've got a high school do-over (17 Again, starring Zac Efron and Leslie Mann), some journalistic thrills (State of Play, starring Russell Crowe and Rachel McAdams), and cardiovascular action (Crank High Voltage, starring Jason Statham and Bai Ling). What do the critics have to say?
17 Again
If you've seen Big, Back to the Future, and Peggy Sue Got Married, you'll have a pretty good idea what's in store with 17 Again. The good news? The critics say the film may be derivative, but it's also clever, entertaining, and poignant, largely thanks to an impressive post-High School Musical turn from Zac Efron. He stars as Mike O'Donnell, a big man on campus circa 1989 who, 20 years later, finds his life and his marriage to high school sweetie Scarlett (Leslie Mann) on the rocks. He gets a second chance to correct his mistakes when he's magically transformed into his 17-year-old self -- albeit with his late-30s personality intact -- and discovers a thing or two about life. While some critics find the film's premise a bit unseemly (a 30-year-old bro-ing down with minors?), most say 17 Again is mostly sweet, funny, and perceptive, and that Efron has a bright future as a leading man.
State of Play
The newspaper industry is in bad shape these days, so it almost seems quaint to release a thriller about a principled investigative journalist in the midst of a vast conspiracy. But here's a news flash: critics say State of Play is engrossing, smart, unnerving, and surprisingly timely, a tribute to the hardworking reporters that shed light on our political system. Russell Crowe stars as old-school Washington beat reporter Cal McAffrey, who's had a solid professional rapport with up-and-coming congressman Stephen Collins (Ben Affleck) -- that is, until some of Collins' associates turn up dead. McAffrey uneasily joins forces with Della (Rachel McAdams), a blogger at the paper, to untangle a sinister web of secrets and lies. The pundits say State of Play may offer a few too many twists and turns, but its ensemble, which also includes Helen Mirren as McAffrey's exacting editor, is unimpeachable, as is the immediacy and authenticity of the newsroom setting. State of Play is Certified Fresh.
Crank High Voltage
It appears the folks behind Crank High Voltage were concerned it would make critics, ahem, cranky, because it wasn't screened prior to release (strange, since its predecessor notched a perfectly respectable 60 percent on the Tomatometer). Jason Statham once again stars as Chev Chelios (apparently no relation to the Red Wings defenseman) whose heart is removed; he must do everything in his power to keep his battery-powered ticker going while finding his missing organ. Kids, guess that Tomatometer! (And don't forget to check out Crank star Bai Ling's Five Favorite Films.)
Also opening this week in limited release:
- Oblivion, a doc about the turbulent recent history of Peru as seen through the eyes of assorted Lima residents, is at 90 percent on the Tomatometer.
- Lemmon Tree, about a conflict over a lemon grove on the Israeli/Palestinian border in the West Bank, is at 85 percent.
- Every Little Step, a documentary about the early days, and revival, of A Chorus Line, is at 83 percent.
- American Violet, a drama about a single mother who must battle accusations of drug dealing, is at 78 percent.
- Is Anybody There?, which stars Michael Caine in the tale of a boy who meets a free-spirited occupant of his parents' old folks home, is at 50 percent..
- The Golden Boys, starring David Carradine and Mariel Hemingway in a comedy about three retired sea captains who could use a woman's touch in their drab Cape Cod house, is at 40 percent.
- The Sleep Dealer, an indie sci-fi drama about exploited third-world workers in a futuristic dystopia, is at 38 percent.
Related Items
| Movie: | State of Play |
| Crank High Voltage | |
| Sleep Dealer | |
| American Violet | |
| Oblivion | |
| Every Little Step | |
| The Lemon Tree | |
| Is Anybody There? | |
| The Golden Boys |
|
jokerboy1991 writes: on Apr 16 2009 04:59 PM State of Play is a good movie, nothing special, I wouldn't say rush to see it but its good. I still think Crank 2 will be awesome, though it is strange though that there not screening it considering the first movie was met fairly well. I'm going to say Crank 2 ends up with a 50-60 percent. (Reply to this) |
|
Vortex&Vertigo writes: on Apr 16 2009 05:18 PM I remember that the first Crank was also not released to Critics.I'll give it 45%. (Reply to this) |
|
tomwaitsjr writes: on Apr 16 2009 06:27 PM I'll go with 25% for Crank 2. If I go to the movies I'm all for "State of Play," although "Sunshine Cleaning" is finally showing here and I'm up for some laughs after the God-Awful "Observe and Report" fiasco. (Reply to this) |
|
Don't Tase Me Bro writes: on Apr 16 2009 06:30 PM I'm guessing that the producers of CRANK 2 have already assessed their fan base from the first film [which more than likely precipitated this follow-up to begin with]...and are probably 'banking' on the fact that there's an interest regardless of what the critical reception is. I certainly am willing to check it out...and I think the producers probably care more about what fans of the first CRANK think than the critics this time around. /Also guessing the consensus here on RT gives it a cumulative rating between 40-50%... (Reply to this) |
|
jokerboy1991 writes: on Apr 16 2009 06:40 PM In reply to this comment (#2427630) God awful?!?!?! Observe and Report?!?!? WHA?!? (Reply to this) |
|
Angelica P. writes: on Apr 16 2009 06:47 PM I think it's interesting how the tomatometer of "17 again" has dropped. I mean, last friday it was 92%, then like 80 on monday and today it's 67%... I wonder if it won't fall more. (Reply to this) |
|
tomwaitsjr writes: on Apr 16 2009 06:48 PM It didn't hommage films so much as butcher their memory, in particular "Taxi Driver." I was also pissed it included a nod to "Miller's Crossing." The best actor in the whole film was that girl at the coffee shop with the protein deficiency. Also, the writer didn't do his homework, if you're going to use mental illness in a script, at least be close to the truth. And that ending was total BS. It was so implausible might as well not have an ending at all. So yah, God Awful. (Reply to this) |
|
tomwaitsjr writes: on Apr 16 2009 06:50 PM Oh, and the continuity on that demented fairy tale was AWFUL. Amazing how quick they fixed the entrance after a car drove through it while it was closed. The more I think about the movie, the angrier I get at it. (Reply to this) |
|
jokerboy1991 writes: on Apr 16 2009 07:04 PM In reply to this comment (#2427646) LOL yeah the movie was implausible but come ON! It was such a great satire of an underdog story. I LOVED Seth Rogen's character how he is just so oblivious and unstable. I liked how they showed guns as a sign of male machismo. I really dug the dark twisted-ness of it, and it was funny. It's funny how insane all of it was. They never ask you to like Rogen's character but to find him interesting, and I found him extremely interesting. (Reply to this) |
|
ledawg writes: on Apr 16 2009 07:50 PM In reply to this comment (#2427657) Alright the two of you! "Observe and Report" is bad. It sucked the joy right out of me! The only time I smiled is when I walked out of the theater 45 minutes into it, saying to my friend "Sorry I suggested this." He stayed. BUT, I came here to say...WHEN DID CRITCS SELL OUT?! "17 Again" has mostly good reviews, so did "High School Musical 3", and that "Hannah Montanna" concert film, SO WHEN DID CRITICS SELL OUT?! Do they have teenage daughters writing the reviews? That dosen't explain Roger Ebert (no kids) liking it! (Reply to this) |
|
ledawg writes: on Apr 16 2009 07:51 PM Oh, and does Russel Crowe look like the caveman from those insurance comercials? (Reply to this) |
|
collex writes: on Apr 16 2009 07:55 PM This week: State of Play. I was going for Dragonball, but as there something interesting this week, I'm going for that.Next week,if nothing interesting comes up, I'll go watch Dragonball... (Reply to this) |
|
Nicole M. writes: on Apr 16 2009 08:05 PM "Observe and Report" was awesome. Things like "the front entrance was repaired far too quickly" ruins watching a movie. That was not the point. He was clearly not your typical leading man; they never tried to pretend he was. And I thought the portrayal of Ronnie's mental illness, though likely dramatized, was fairly in keeping with the basics of bipolar disorder. The disorder is characterized by boughts of mania (over-confidence, hightened sexuality, recklessness, etc) and depression (depressed mood, isolation, lack of regard for oneself). In the first half of the film, he was on his meds and only exhibited slightly weird behavior. When he went off his meds, he appeared to be in a state of functioning mania. Most of his outrageous behavior occured after going off his meds and after he was rejected from the police academy. Anyway, I know this was a little long-winded, but it is part of the reason that I enjoyed the film so much. If you go into the film expecting cute, fat, self-deprecating, harmless Seth Rogen, you will be disappointed (except for the "fat" part). I do want to see State of Play. The cast is just too good to pass up. (Reply to this) |
|
ledawg writes: on Apr 16 2009 08:06 PM In reply to this comment (#2427714) NO! Don't settle for "Dragonball"! (Reply to this) |
|
Speaker for the Films writes: on Apr 16 2009 08:17 PM In reply to this comment (#2427698) If a movie aimed for a tween is tolerable, it isn't good awful. Not every movie can be the Dark Knight. And if you don't like what critics say, why are you even on this site? (Reply to this) |
|
Chris B. writes: on Apr 16 2009 08:27 PM if i was goin to the movies this weekend i'd be seein the new crank. i don't care what critics say. the first was awesome and jason statham is always awesome. to heck with state of play and 17 again crap. i go to theaters to see some explosions and have fun and what not. i could care less about people talking and talking. i'll prolly rent state of play on dvd or something. (Reply to this) |
|
ledawg writes: on Apr 16 2009 08:28 PM In reply to this comment (#2427788) Hey, hey, hey, I never said I don't care what they said. Bashin' them is half the fun. (Reply to this) |
|
jokerboy1991 writes: on Apr 16 2009 08:33 PM In reply to this comment (#2427739) You nailed it right on the head, couldn't have said it better myself... Observe and Report just seems to be splitting opinions right in half- you either love it or hate. Of course I loved it. I think its going to stand the test of time though, and go down as a cult classic on the level of... The Big Lebowski. Yeah I said it, don't bash me, in 10 years if I was wrong then you can say something! (Reply to this) |
|
Hans M. writes: on Apr 16 2009 08:39 PM Yeah, the more I hear about "Observe and Report" the more uninspired I am about seeing it. I had hopes for it, but based on some reviews and reactions like on this thread, it does not sound like it will satisfy. I did enjoy "I Love You, Man," though! I'd recommend that. I am still looking forward to catching "Adventureland." Hopefully, this weekedn we'll catch "Tokyo," though reviews seem mixed. I'm still curious. As for "17 Again," I was never planning on seeing that, but, come on, "critics say the film may be derivative, but it's also clever, entertaining, and poignant," sheesh! The film might as well not exist. What lame crap that sounds like. (Reply to this) |
|
ledawg writes: on Apr 16 2009 08:45 PM In reply to this comment (#2427835) Except "Lebowski" tried to be funny. (Reply to this) |
| You must be registered to post comments. Login or Register. |










